Back to Insights

15. Jul 2026

Blog

Online Counterfeiting as an Increasing Risk: What Measures Can Brand Owners Take?

Morea Pula

Morea Pula

Author

Counterfeit goods are primarily associated with informal markets and hidden supply chains. Increasingly, however, they are also being offered through online marketplaces, social media pages, sponsored advertisements and accounts designed to imitate the original brand owner.

The digital environment provides counterfeiters with speed, anonymity and access to large numbers of consumers across multiple jurisdictions. For brand owners, the consequences extend beyond lost sales, as ounterfeit products can damage a brand’s reputation, undermine consumer trust and create serious safety risks, particularly where cosmetics, medicines, food products or electronics are involved. Responding effectively to these threats therefore requires a structured online enforcement strategy.

1.    Secure and organise your IP rights

Effective enforcement begins with proper registration. Trade marks should be protected in every territory where the brand operates, manufactures or sells its products, as well as in jurisdictions where it may face a significant counterfeiting risk. Relevant designs and copyright-protected materials should also be identified and properly documented as part of the brand’s intellectual property portfolio.

As a brand owner, you should maintain an enforcement file that includes registration certificates, authorized product images, packaging details, lists of official distributors as well as examples that show how genuine products differ from counterfeits. Having this information readily available allows the brand owner to respond more efficiently when an online platform, customs authority or other enforcement body requests evidence of ownership or infringement. Speed is particularly important in the online environment, where infringing listings can quickly reach consumers or disappear before further action is taken.

2.    Monitor regularly

Brands should regularly monitor marketplaces, social media, search engines, domain registrations and online advertisements. Such monitoring should also cover misspellings, altered logos or variations thereof, translated versions or suspicious combinations such as the product name together with “replica” or “inspired”.

During monitoring, it is crucial to preserve any available evidence, including screenshots, URLs, seller details, dates, prices, product descriptions and payment or delivery information. This step is often overlooked, but it is important as information about the seller or the scale of the activity may disappear once the content is removed. Properly preserved evidence may later support civil proceedings, customs action, criminal complaints or coordinated enforcement against repeat offenders.

3.    Be aware of available mechanisms

In the European Union, for example, the Digital Services Act (DSA) has significantly strengthened notice-and-action procedures by requiring online platforms to implement clear, user-friendly mechanisms for reporting illegal content, including counterfeit listings. Once a sufficiently substantiated notice is submitted, platforms are expected to act promptly and provide feedback to the notifier. The DSA also introduces enhanced transparency obligations, such as requiring platforms to explain their content moderation decisions and publish regular reports on their enforcement activities.

For online marketplaces specifically, the DSA imposes “Know Your Business Customer” (KYBC) obligations. These require platforms to collect, verify and retain key information about traders before allowing them to sell goods or services. This includes details such as the trader’s name, contact information, identification documents and, where applicable, business registration data. The aim is to improve the traceability of sellers and make it more difficult for counterfeiters to operate anonymously or re-enter the platform after being removed.

4.    Consider further legal action

For serious or repeated infringements, brand owners may also consider warning letters, domain-name proceedings, civil litigation, interim measures and complaints to the competent authorities. Customs recordals can also help enforcement authorities identify and detain suspicious shipments before counterfeit goods enter the market. Brand owners should provide practical product-identification guidance and maintain clear contact details for customs authorities.

Online counterfeiting is rarely eliminated through a single action. The objective is to make infringement harder, less profitable and easier to detect. Brands combining registration, monitoring, evidence preservation, platform enforcement, customs cooperation and targeted legal action are better positioned to protect both their market and their customers.

For more information, you can contact us at info@ip-legals.com.